Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But... mergers really do not only make markets less competitive at all!

May mergers of huge companies often have negative impact. Firstly most mergers do not involve multi-billion dollar companies at all, secondly many mergers occur when one company is is trouble, and thirdly good takeovers increase distribution of the smaller companies brand.

Good examples of successful mergers/takeovers like this include:

Halotop bought by Wells Enterprises

Geely buying Volvo

SAIC buying MG

Most acquisitions by Proctor & Gamble

Most acquisitions and mergers in the markup and beauty space.



    Most acquisitions by Proctor & Gamble
That is quite a broad statement. Can you explain more?


In the FMCG space that P&G is in most of their takeovers improve distribution for the company that is being acquired, and P&G generally seems to prefer to leave the brand and management of the company alone.

I'm sure there have been some that haven't been successful, but most that I'm aware of have gone very well.


> Good examples of successful mergers/takeovers like this include:

How are you defining "good" or "successful" here?


There hasn't been a significant negative backlash, availability of the products increased, and revenue increased for the acquiring company.

The improved availability via better distribution is a win for consumers and the increase in revenue is a win for the company and shareholders.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: