Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

“Spun” and “span” are both past tense forms of “spin”, but “span” is both archaic and singular, and so would be an odd choice in any current writing, and a disagreement in number where, as here, it is used with a plural subject.


Different past tense for singular vs plural? Are there any other words that have that besides "is"?

Wiktionary doesn't seem to mention it being singular, although I might be misunderstanding it:

> (dated, now uncommon) simple past of spin

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/span#English


> Different past tense for singular vs plural? Are there any other words that have that besides "is"?

Non-archaic? Quite possibly not. English has done a very good job of shedding inflections.

But “span” (as a past tense of “spin” isn’t non-archaic).

> Wiktionary doesn't seem to mention it being singular, although I might be misunderstanding it:

My sources were citing discussion in the OED, but I haven't verified them.


What do you mean singular? I span, you span, he/she/it span, we span, you span, they span. These all sound grammatical to me. I can’t think of many English verbs that inflect differently for the same person but different number. In fact off the top of my head the only one I can think of is “to be” (I am, we were)


There's nothing about it being singular in the dictionary. And I've seen both used in modern writing. Perhaps a US vs UK vs rest of the english speaking world thing?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: