Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But what's the alternative?

Assume that Posterous was charging for their services with a monthly fee. Is this any guarantee that they wouldn't take the same offer to sell? Or would you just be out your monthly fees and still have to move?

The more money they have coming in, the more desirable an acquisition they become. In theory, they might have less pressure to sell if they have cash flow, but it's not clear this is enough to counteract their increased appeal to an acquirer. Rather than indicting "free" services, it would seem more rational to avoid "cloud" services whether paid or unpaid.

Perhap you should choose only services from companies you feel are too large to be acquired (Google) or companies whose code is available to run on your own if they were to close down (Github). Or stick with self-hosted solutions with that plan that you can change hosts as necessary.

For any company you chose, I think you have to presume that while they will try to keep their service running, they will be doing so primarily out of self-interest. The more you can align your interests with theirs, the better the chance that the service will continue and you won't have to move.



I think being paid there is more chance that they would be acquired for their product and not just the team. There is still no guarantee of course.


Paid product companies don't get bought nearly as often, either. In a lot of ways it makes you an unattractive acquisition target.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: