Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It baffles me why this would be successful SEO -- and assuming that it actually isn't, it baffles me why CNET thinks it would be.

If the content deleted is garbage, why wouldn't it help? No clue on CNET's overall quality, but I don't have a favorable image of it. Just had a look at their main page and that did not do it any favors.



Because the remaining content is also garbage (probably even worse garbage gauging by the trends I observed before I started ignoring CNET altogether)




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: