“Efficient market hypothesis” is probably one of the most misleadingly named concept: this result has nothing do to with market “efficiency” (by any common meanings of this word). If market prices were purely random, then nobody could ever “beat the market” either, but a market that give purely random valuation to assets is the least efficient market possible: it means that price is just completely useless as an indicator of anything.

Other than this, this is just a collection of bad takes based on flawed understanding of topics (inheritable ≠ innate, GDP ≠ well being, etc.)