Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understand that communities evolve, mutate and sometimes divide over time. Online communities are the same, maybe just faster and larger.

The author of the article though feels a bit odd? What exactly is the endgame here? You divided a subreddit and created a new one, that's good for you and your "disciples" I guess...? Like what the hell I've had just read...?



You didn't read anything, there's very little content. It's just a narrative.

The author split a group of users off an established website and used it to build his own reputation, under the banner of a 'belief system'.

The author mentions concepts that exist and should be defined out, like prioritization and belief, but does absolutely nothing to fill in those blanks with useful information.

I'd be wary of membership with these 'belief system' based groups. The narrative self-promotes excessively, promises everything and delivers nothing.

Expect to see more of this as the desire to be in the 'inner circle' or members area increases.

There's nothing on the other side of the velvet rope, but it does destroy institutions and the craft of software by taking people and knowledge off the map.

In the end, it's better to walk away.


You’re seeing only the surface level content. Context is needed to understand more of this post. So, go buy his subscription and find out.


> "but it does destroy institutions and the craft of software by taking people and knowledge off the map"

Would you mind elaborating on this please @barrysteve - particularly how it destroys institutions and the craft of software? - thank you.


> What exactly is the endgame here?

To make a living doing a niche.

To find that niche in a predictable way.


Exactly. Not sure why it isn't clear for the parent comment.


I liked the concepts a lot. But the money part was ambiguous.

As in:

1. Get fascinated by some area a community is interested in

2. Dig into it, find and overcome challenges

3. Create an offshoot community around your insights

4. ???

5. Profit

I feel like Ken in the Barbie Movie had 1-3. He was really into "Beach". And lots of people liked "Beach". But that didn't lead to any money in the real world.

A follow up essay on that missing link would be great.


> A follow up essay on that missing link would be great.

How about a follow-up book you can buy?

https://www.scottscheper.com/antinet


Once you have a community, monetization just requires a bit of creativity. If it’s an authentic community, you’ll already have deep insights into what members desires are (intellectual fullfillment, belonging, relationships, etc) and how those can be fulfilled better. It can be something as simple as status badges for donors, or something more complex like a new app or product.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: