Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's crazy to me that paying ransoms is legal.


It's a gray area - most big companies will get cybersecurity insurance - Then the insurance company pays the ransom (assuming your policy covers it.). When working at a Small Cap financial services company, our policy cost north of $2MM a year.


Such clear Game theory. If nobody pays ransom, the group suffers less over all. But targeted individuals suffer greatly. Targeted individuals have a high incentive to pay, which encourages more attacks on the group.

A previous company I worked for took the “high road”. Mostly cause the CIO was a delusional psychopath. She refused to pay the mere 1 mil ransom. Told the CEO the disaster recovery systems would bring the company back online in a few hours (everybody, except her apparently, knew the DR system was a total joke). Hackers wiped the encrypted drives of every machine in the company and said good day.

4 weeks later they had the website, basic email and server operations functioning again. 3 months later they had restored business continuity more or less.

She was fired a week after that.

I’m guessing it cost the company 10’s if not over 100 million.


If it's illegal then companies will still pay ransoms, just quietly and the feds don't get any chances to investigate it.


I doubt it, especially if you make the executives personally liable. There are lots of other profitable things that companies generally don't do because they are illegal.


And bonus double hit. After payment, blackmail




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: