Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Same, and I'm very progressive and completely disagree with her Objectivist philosophy, because she's obviously not a philosopher. She's a great writer though, her work can motivate people, and has for sometime made me reflect and move forward with my life.

But I believe it might be toxic for the HN crew.

Let's be frank, people don't read much on average, so they take whatever book or author you read as your own personality, when in reality people should read many books with different ideas, so you can form your own.

One can learn a lot from reading from Friedman to Marx.

This is why I also think that one should read all the classics instead of chasing book recommendations, any community you ask will give them recommendation for non-technical subjects that are from their own worldview, which in turn, will make you not smarter, but likely more stupid than you initially started before you've read those books.



Well said.

She had a really unique view of the world, I appreciated it, and it definitely helped me develop my own view of the world. I am about to read the Upanishads along a similar line of thought.


I think this is the first time I've heard anyone talk about Rand in a way that matches my own experience. Her writing definitely affected how I saw the world and I think that makes it good. But at the same time it's like nerd sniping for philosophy, I had such a visceral reaction to how well she presents an absolutely insane way of thinking that you can't just dismiss her out of hand. It forces you to genuinely learn to be able to command the vocabulary and ideas to really explain where the cracks are.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: