> I would bet good money that if GPT-3.5 could have magically interacted with those 1966 participants, it would have fooled most of them, as it would have been inconceivable for a computer to exhibit such capabilities then.
You cannot just "fool" someone in the Turing test, the interrogator knows one of the two partners is a computer. To pass you need to perform better than your human companion.
Whether the interrogator knows of the existence of advanced auto-complete systems is not very important in this setup. He knows of existence of fellow humans and needs to identify one when he meets him.
You cannot just "fool" someone in the Turing test, the interrogator knows one of the two partners is a computer. To pass you need to perform better than your human companion.
Whether the interrogator knows of the existence of advanced auto-complete systems is not very important in this setup. He knows of existence of fellow humans and needs to identify one when he meets him.