Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Were you measuring what users like, or what they "engage" with?

If I see a post on mastodon, it's from someone I follow or a post that someone I follow thought was worth sharing. That's a genuine interaction between humans. I get to decide what's in my feed based on who I follow and the filters I set up. The system is designed only to connect me with people I choose to follow.

Meanwhile, an algorithmic feed with no options is designed for one thing: manipulating users to optimize "engagement". That by definition requires ignoring what users prefer. I really shouldn't have to explain that this is a bad thing.



We ran lots of experiments, including asking people survey questions, monitoring usage, asking people offline to try both, etc

You're wrong about the design of algorithmic feeds. I worked on them, that's not how we designed them.


How about giving the people the option and letting them decide for themselves.

Also, 20% of people is hundreds of millions of people.


Facebook engr is famous for popularizing the phrase “one in a million happens every millisecond” so this 20% hand wringing is funny to me


People have the option, you can choose to use a chronological feed on Facebook and Meta




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: