Can't you just paste the video URL into https://gemini.google.com/ with the prompt "Summarize this video" ?
Example (Gemini free tier):
Summarize this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nsE4MyqQf4
The video is about a Cloudflare outage caused by a poorly written regular expression.
The regular expression was part of a web application firewall rule designed to detect cross-site scripting attempts. The rule was supposed to match JavaScript keywords, suspicious characters, and strings with equal signs, which are potential indicators of malicious URL query strings. However, the regular expression was written in a way that caused it to match an unexpectedly large number of strings. This led to the web application firewall consuming 100% of CPU on all of Cloudflare's servers, which caused a global outage.
The video goes into detail about how the regular expression worked and why it was so inefficient. It also discusses the steps that Cloudflare took to fix the problem and prevent it from happening again.
Here are some of the key points from the video:
The regular expression used a non-capturing group, which caused it to match many more strings than it was intended to.
The regular expression used a dot star, which matches any character zero or more times. This can be very inefficient if the regular expression is not carefully written.
The regular expression used backtracking, which is a technique that can be very slow if the regular expression is not carefully written.
The video concludes with a warning about the dangers of using regular expressions without understanding how they work. It also suggests that people should use simpler tools, such as string contains, whenever possible.
I get mixed results when asking Gemini to summarize videos. Sometimes it works perfectly, other times it just says I have an invalid link. My hypothesis was that YouTube creators had some sort of option to opt out of AI-related tooling, but maybe there's more to the story.
"I'm sorry, but I'm unable to access this YouTube content. This is possible for a number of reasons, but the most common are: the content isn't a valid YouTube link, the video is potentially unsafe, the content does not have a captions file that I can read, or the video language is currently not supported."
I've noticed that typically Gemini seems to fail on longer Youtube videos, I think I've had trouble for anything longer than 30 mins or so. Shorter videos (which have captions) seem fine. Are you seeing this as well?
Kagi's Universal Summarizer produced this summary. I wonder why a relatively smaller player can get it working but the "big boys" cannot.
The video analyzes whether more expensive eggs are worth it by testing the claims that they are more ethical, healthier, and tastier. Through research and blind taste tests, the author found that expensive pasture-raised or free-range eggs come from hens that are treated more humanely. While there are some minor nutritional differences between egg types, the author determined they are insignificant unless eggs are a major part of one's diet. Blind taste tests revealed only subtle differences in flavor and texture between expensive and conventional eggs. In conclusion, while expensive eggs may be slightly better for hens and sight, their higher cost is hard to justify solely based on nutrition or taste.
I got a summary on both Gemini Pro and Gemini Advanced:
Summarize this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YY7K7Xa5rE
#Gemini Pro (free tier):
Here is a summary of the video Are Expensive Eggs Worth It? by Ethan Chlebowski:
The video discusses the different factors that affect the price of eggs, including the egg size and grades, and the egg certifications. It also does a blind taste test to see if there is a difference in taste between expensive eggs and cheaper eggs.
The video discusses the different factors that affect the price of eggs, including the egg size and grades, and the egg certifications. It also does a blind taste test to see if there is a difference in taste between expensive eggs and cheaper eggs.
Here are the key takeaways from the video:
* *Are expensive eggs more ethical and Humane?* Yes, there are clear differences in how chickens are treated when it comes to laying eggs. If you want to ensure the highest standard of living for chickens, look for pasture-raised certified Humane eggs.
* *Are expensive eggs healthier for you?* There can be small macro and micronutrient differences between different egg types, but you would need to evaluate the rest of your diet and lifestyle to see if that makes sense for you.
* *Do expensive eggs taste better?* No, there may be very minor differences in taste, texture, and Aroma, but nothing significant. However, there is a clear difference in sight, which may matter depending on what you are making.
Overall, the speaker concludes that expensive eggs are not necessarily worth it in terms of taste or health benefits. However, if you are concerned about the ethical treatment of chickens, you may want to consider buying pasture-raised eggs.
#Gemini Advanced:
In this video, Ethan Chlebowski investigates whether expensive eggs are worth it. He covers the following aspects:
\
Are expensive eggs more ethical and Humane?
Are expensive eggs healthier for you?
Do expensive eggs taste better?
Are expensive eggs more ethical and Humane?
There are clear differences in how chickens are treated depending on the egg production method. More expensive eggs often come from chickens that are raised in more humane conditions, such as pasture-raised or cage-free. However, there are also certifications and labels that may not necessarily mean what you think they do. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to buy more expensive eggs based on ethics is up to you.
Are expensive eggs healthier for you?
There can be small differences in the nutrient content of eggs from different production methods. However, it is difficult to say definitively whether these differences are significant enough to impact your health.
Do expensive eggs taste better?
Ethan conducted taste tests to compare expensive eggs to less expensive eggs. He found that there may be very minor differences in taste, texture, and Aroma, but they were not significant enough to say that one type of egg was definitively better than the other.
Overall, Ethan concludes that whether or not expensive eggs are worth it depends on your individual priorities. If you are concerned about animal welfare, you may be willing to pay more for eggs from chickens that are raised in more humane conditions. However, if you are on a tight budget, you may not find that the taste or nutritional benefits of expensive eggs justify the cost.
Written article that takes two minutes to read -> half hour YT vid with 95% fluff against a background of bookshelves with a succulent, a toy robot, and a mildly interesting light fitting -> AI -> text summary that takes two minutes to read.
I blame YouTube, and (separately) the ad-supported model. I don't like the trend of turning articles into videos in the first place, but without the fact that the longer you make a video the more ads you can stuff into it (and YouTube's crazy amount of ads), I think most videos would be much shorter, simply because long videos take more effort to produce.
YouTube Premium doesn't help much here because (1) as long as there is a significant amount of users watching ads, YouTube will still incentivize creators to make longer videos and (2) the subscription model is a bad deal for everyone but YouTube themselves (users only rent their content instead of "own" (which is still a better deal for almost all values of "item
own"), creators get a tiny slice of a fixed-size pie).
Why are you not just using yt-dl to download the subtitles? Using yt-dl you can also fallback in case the subtitles don't exist and instead download the videos, convert them to mp3, and then run them through whisper[1] locally.
"I don't have enough information to do that. I'm a large language model, able to communicate in response to a wide range of prompts and questions, but my knowledge about that specific video is limited. Is there anything else I can do to help?"
Wouldn't that mean actually more work than even watching the video? The point of such a helper tool is to spare time, not to have fun with toys. I mean nothing wrong with toys but hardly a help in this case.
I'm interested in 1-2h long videos of people talking about interesting stuff. But I don't have time to watch them all.
It'd be great to have a tool to get accurate transcripts. The YouTube subtitles can be easily downloaded, but aren't readable on their own. They often lack even basic punctuation or sentence structure.
It'd be even more great to get good condensed transcripts, or event targeted condensed transcripts of the things I'm interested in in that particular video.
A bit tongue in cheek, but I summarized your article using artificial intelligence ;)
P.S. GPT 3.5 has a 16k context window now
---
AI Generated summary:
Marco's newsletter introduces a tutorial on developing a system in Node.js to generate summaries from YouTube videos using OpenAI's completions API. The architecture involves extracting text from videos and then creating text summaries. The process includes scraping subtitles, chunking text, and recursively summarizing using OpenAI. The system is built using Yarn, Node.js, Axios, and other libraries. The CLI allows users to summarize videos by providing the YouTube link and language code. Node.js is favored due to its flexibility, efficiency, and compatibility with the ChatGPT API. The project code and details are available on Marco's GitHub repository.
1: What prerequisites do I need to know before using ChatGPT API and Node.js for summarizing YouTube videos?
A: Before using ChatGPT API and Node.js for summarizing YouTube videos, you need to have Yarn and Node.js installed, familiarity with ES6 syntax, knowledge of HTTP calls using Axios, understanding of handling queues for promises, and the ability to work with interactive command line tools using yargs.
2: How can the ChatGPT API be applied to summarize the content of a YouTube video?
A: The ChatGPT API can be applied to summarize the content of a YouTube video by first extracting text from the video, chunking the text into manageable parts, and then using the recursive summarization technique to generate a summary by submitting prompts to the completions API. This process involves managing multiple promises concurrently to avoid rate-limiting issues and slower response times.
3: Why is Node.js a preferred choice for implementing a project that summarizes YouTube videos with the ChatGPT API?
A: Node.js is a preferred choice for implementing a project that summarizes YouTube videos with the ChatGPT API due to its efficiency in handling asynchronous operations, ease of building scalable applications, compatibility with various libraries and tools required for the project, and support for modern JavaScript features like ES6 syntax.
> The video demonstrates how to use open AI's speech to text model, ChaiGPT, and Librosa to automate the process of summarizing YouTube videos. The tool can provide both long and short summaries of the videos and is best suited for videos with a lot of audio. The examples given in the video include summaries of a video on stretching and a conversation on AI alignment and the future of AI
P.S: I am just surprised how much our coding infra has evolved. I still remember typing 120 lines of code from Charles Petzold book just to pop up a hello world dialog box. Today in less than 30 lines of code, I can fetch Youtube captions and summarise it.
so, I just tried this, and Gemini answered "I don't have enough information to do this".
BUT, then I checked the "drafts", and one of the 3 drafted answers actually contains a short summary of the video.
What the hell is happening here?
Can't you just ask GPT to give you a summary? Here's my prompt for 3.5, it's not very sophisticated.
System: You are a helpful AI assistant who follows instructions to the letter. You will generate a summary of the article.
Article: {ARTICLE}
User: Summarize the previous text in one paragraph. Include as many topics as possible, make every word count. Create only one single summary and stop once you are done.
so, I just tried this, and Gemini answered "I don't have enough information to do this".
BUT, then I checked the "drafts", and one of the 3 drafted answers actually contains a short summary of the video.
What the hell is happening here?
Example (Gemini free tier):
The video is about a Cloudflare outage caused by a poorly written regular expression.The regular expression was part of a web application firewall rule designed to detect cross-site scripting attempts. The rule was supposed to match JavaScript keywords, suspicious characters, and strings with equal signs, which are potential indicators of malicious URL query strings. However, the regular expression was written in a way that caused it to match an unexpectedly large number of strings. This led to the web application firewall consuming 100% of CPU on all of Cloudflare's servers, which caused a global outage.
The video goes into detail about how the regular expression worked and why it was so inefficient. It also discusses the steps that Cloudflare took to fix the problem and prevent it from happening again.
Here are some of the key points from the video:
The regular expression used a non-capturing group, which caused it to match many more strings than it was intended to. The regular expression used a dot star, which matches any character zero or more times. This can be very inefficient if the regular expression is not carefully written. The regular expression used backtracking, which is a technique that can be very slow if the regular expression is not carefully written. The video concludes with a warning about the dangers of using regular expressions without understanding how they work. It also suggests that people should use simpler tools, such as string contains, whenever possible.