Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Intel doesn't have and has never had a GPU line worth writing home about

That is my point. Emphasizing the earlier statement: "They missed the gaming market".



Your point is bad. Ignoring the fact that Intel's bread and butter is the CPU, of which they have a dominant gaming marketshare, is obtuse.


They missed the GPU market (AI/ML/Gaming) and the console market. Hence they lost all of that to Nvidia and AMD. Both of those companies now have a bigger market cap than Intel.

How is this so difficult to understand? It is very simple, not obtuse, unless you are autistic.

Nvidia market cap is $2.26 Trillion.

AMD market cap is $290 Billion.

Intel market cap is $178 Billion.

AMD and Nvidia used to be a tiny fraction of Intel.

You guys are getting autistically stuck on this irrelevant detail about CPU popularity in gaming PCs and missing the bigger topic of the discussion. But even in that niche, Intel has lost significant market share to AMD.


"Autistic". You keep using that word, but I don't think it means what you think it means.

Are we back in kindergarten, with name calling?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: