> The actual ruling was NOT an "textualist" interpretation at all. That’s precis... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		adriand on June 29, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Supreme Court overturns 40-year-old "Chevron defer... > The actual ruling was NOT an "textualist" interpretation at all. That’s precisely my point. They are textualists when it’s convenient. When the textualist outcome would be unsatisfactory from an ideological perspective, then they aren’t textualists any more.

caseysoftware on June 29, 2024 [–]

That's one possibility.

Another is that they're "originalists" in their interpretation. How do their decisions hold up if you apply that perspective?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact