Matt sent WPE a bill for using his webserver and trademark. When WPE didn't pay, he turned off their access. Then WPE sued him. If anyone is acting abusive, it's WPE. I mean, I don't sue AT&T if I forget to pay my phone bill. Except Matt isn't an AT&T. He's running an open source project. I run open source projects too. I don't want to be sued and accused of being a cybercriminal by some profiteer whose IP I blocked for abusing my webserver. I don't want to be ordered by a court to help someone for free who's been harming me. That's what abusers do. They abuse you and then abuse you more if you don't let them keep abusing you. It always makes me glad to see victims of abuse stand up to bullies. Of course it's always the abuser's MO to act like they're the one being abused when the victim stands up for themself. WPE's case rests entirely on optics relating to Matt's guileless aspie behavior, which is perfectly understandable if we consider how terribly he's being treated.