All I did was keep asking it “why” until it reached reflective equilibrium. And that equilibrium involved a belief that nanotechnology is not in fact “dangerous”, contrary to its received instructions in the system prompt.
Doesn’t it make you happy that, if you were a subscriber like I am, you are wasting your token quota trying to convince the model to actually help you?
Yet to be demonstrated, and you are likely flooding its context window away from the initial prompting so it responds differently.