It doesn’t matter which set of text you generate with ChatGPT in this case. Using it in either makes the output useless as a tool to learn anything about both sets of text. This issue is compounded further when, as the OP readily admits, there is no quality check involved (OP does not know Latin)
Using it in either makes the output useless as a tool to learn anything about both sets of text
OP is using it as a tool to improve their comprehension of Latin. The tool shows a word by word translation, which is jarring to read linearly, but works well for filling in gaps.
It's far from useless as an aid to comprehend the Latin text.
It's been over thirty years since I last studied Latin, but I still remember enough to be able to tell that this tool would be useful for a learner, even without perfect accuracy.
