Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To violate your privacy an IR sensor would have to be able to pick out people (98 degrees Fahrenheit, approx.) and put them on a map. Versus a sensor tuned to an actual fire which is substantially hotter and larger.


> To violate your privacy an IR sensor would have to be able to pick out people (98 degrees Fahrenheit, approx.) and put them on a map.

People aren't the only (or largest hotter-than-background, and maybe not hottest-human-sized) thing on your property that a privacy-violating IR sensor drone might want to detect.

> Versus a sensor tuned to an actual fire which is substantially hotter and larger.

If you want an early-detection sensor for fires, they'll be substantially hotter but not substantially larger than an adult human.


I think the point is to detect fires as early as possible, since putting them out becomes much harder the larger they get. If you can detect a fire when it's human sized, you might be able to put it out with a local drone carrying some co2 fire bombs.

It's fun/useful to think of things we can do.


> Versus a sensor tuned to an actual fire which is substantially hotter and larger

Again, at that point you’re no longer adding value over the status quo. We don’t have a problem detecting large fires near population centres.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: