Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

IMO the first argument is invalid, however, the second one is a completely valid argument.


> "Defendants’ tools undermine and damage The Times’s relationship with its readers and deprive The Times of subscription, licensing, advertising, and affiliate revenue."

News flash: you can read newspaper articles at the library.


Yes, and libraries pay for that access. They also don't obfuscate the origin or remove the advertising. Don't equate libraries with what OpenAI does.


> News flash: you can read newspaper articles at the library.

Reading an article != selling a product that redistributes the article.


And its no coincidence that the NYTimes isn't suing OpenAI for reading newspaper articles at the library...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: