Perhaps read my full conversation with Dan before throwing around (frankly ironic) accusations as if your view is the unambiguously correct one. Those points were addressed well before your post, including where I concede the issues with the title and explain the one I originally intended was too long to fit. And so is yours, by the way.
The only thing your post accomplished was spread hate and insults without any empathy or effort to understand. If you want to understand what is wrong with the world today, consider looking inward.
"> Nor is the phrase neutral; it's obviously accusatory.
Again, I agree. But as I mentioned before, I also don’t see a non-critical stance which would make the situation worth commenting on, and I do believe it should be commented on. The only reason it’s worth commenting at all is because it’s bad."
Right, so you did exactly what flame filters are meant to stop, you thought something was so outrageous that you intentionally wrote an inflammatory headline to enrage people into commentary. Then when someone calls you out on it, they're hateful.
I don't know what you could have possibly found hateful, but that's a word people like you love to use. You are exactly the person PG was talking about in his article on wokeness. You don't even see your own default Marxist belief that factory owners/operators are evil and workers are good, and anyone who disagrees with you must be hateful. It is why you have the idea that any attempt by factory owner/operators to improve operations is "abuse", and thus any product meant to help them in that is "inhumane".
Really, read PG's last essay. It will clarify for you why you are insufferable. Or not, I don't care, you're not worth further effort.
The only thing your post accomplished was spread hate and insults without any empathy or effort to understand. If you want to understand what is wrong with the world today, consider looking inward.