Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not disagreeing with "let them do it", but the comparison with computer music isn't really fair.

Computer music, as it existed a couple decades ago, still played exactly what you asked it to, and it wasn't filling areas where you underspecified the music with a statistical model of trillions of existing songs. And that's the difference, for me: the ability to underspecify, and have the details be filled in and added in a way that to the audience will be perceived as intentful, but which is not.



Agreed - computer music compared to live music is what, say, Adobe Illustrator is to drawing. Or a Wacom drawing table, but definitely not prompting AI to draw for you.

Whether drawing (writing etc.) through AI counts as drawing (as making art) is a debate we have to resolve in the upcoming future.


Tell that to guitar effects, electronic music and anything that has any amount of randomness added

As soon as we get more control over AI output, those arguments will finally die their well deserved death

To those that AI art offend: don't think of people as artists, but simply as art directors dealing with stubborn artists that won't ever work to spec




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: