Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>on top of the air cooling effects of evaporation

I think you meant to say *on top of shade* because blocking the sun is the main effect here (the geometry makes more sense too!)

Less confusing phrase from abstract which implies that the 0.5deg evaporative cooling is almost a rounding error:

  during the day, trees provide significant shade by intercepting solar radiation, reducing mean radiant temperature (up to 16 °C)


   during the day, trees provide significant shade by intercepting solar radiation, reducing mean radiant temperature (up to 16 °C)
Sadly they work the opposite way at night, they don't allow SPACE to cool the ground. A textil/plastic plate moved automatically can provide more cold, if that's the goal.


It really depends on how broad and high the tree canopy is; you don’t need super high tree density to provide a lot of shade.

The main benefit over other solutions is that properly selected trees require very little upkeep from humans, unlike anything mechanical or requiring movement. Though I imagine that is less the case in Vegas.


To me what seems too good to be possible is the triple combo of shade, radiative cooling, and water harvesting

Only ambient sunlight needed here, but they'd have to make the panels horizontal (indeed, curtained at night like you say) somehow:

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/mits-high-tech-hydroge...

Edit I guess the low-maintenance option might be some kind of giant variegated Madagascan succulent




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: