Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm just a casual user, and I didn't really notice any difference between deb and rpm. But I did notice a significant difference between apt and yum. Yum was much slower and less clever in figuring out dependencies. I've had yum uninstall unrelated programs sharing libs with the one being uninstalled. It seems like apt(itude) has more advanced resolution algos built in. Plus more is avail as deb than rpm, no need for manual download via websites.


I'll second this. It is also my experience, having used both Fedora and CentOS (2002-2008) and Ubuntu (2004 to now).


For me apt is yum, so I've never bothered to check whether yum is apt.

I'll get my coat and leave this comment thread now.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: