IANAL either, which is why I asked for case law. I’d like to understand a bit more.
Strong statements like the OPs without qualifications can lead to skewed ideas. For example look at the amount of damage done by the “shareholder primacy” theory which many believe is a core legal requirement rather than a legal theory.
Strong statements like the OPs without qualifications can lead to skewed ideas. For example look at the amount of damage done by the “shareholder primacy” theory which many believe is a core legal requirement rather than a legal theory.