Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You would have relegated Dell and Gateway 2000 to second tier-PC clone maker along with all the other PC clone makers, below Compaq, since their OEM version of MS-DOS wouldn't get the Compaq tweaks necessary to be 100% IBM PC compatible (unless Microsoft or these non-Compaq OEMs duplicated Compaq's compatibility work).


They could have licensed Compaq’s version.

By the way, the Gateway 2000 was a machine by Gateway, not a vendor.


No.

Gateway 2000 was the actual name of the company at that time.

They dropped the 2000 close to the year 2000. I assume it wouldn't look good for a forward-looking tech company to be named for a year in the past.

see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gateway_2000


Well, that explains why I had thought it was a very popular model. :/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: