It's tangential, as most people here aren't involved in traditional media, but this is a government that is interested in suppressing speech it dislikes [1]. Not actively harmful speech, threats and the like, just things they dislike. If this continues it could have significant impact for companies in the US, working with the US, and people working in the US but from other countries. This is the same administration that wants to go through social media posts and comments of people visiting the country to screen them for bad thoughts. Members of the administration are calling on people to rat each other out to their employers for this thoughtcrime.
> a recent example, out of Congress. Calling on social media companies to ban users because they said something he dislikes.
Social media commonly already has terms of service which forbid glorification of violence. Expecting TOS to be applied fairly (i.e. without consideration of who got shot and who did the shooting) seems entirely reasonable to me.
