Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sometimes I wonder - maybe websites were enough? Most people on most platforms are readers/consumers, not producers anyways. Maybe having a personal website was a good filter for publishing after all? Maybe personal websites + sites like hackernews that allows us to discuss our and other people's work is the best the Internet could be.


Maybe pianos were enough. Radio has made it so families no longer gather round and sing in the evenings and TikTok is even worse than radio


It depends; not everything that's newer is automatically better.

Web and websites did the heavy lifting of instant and world-wide information sharing.

With social media, open or closed, there are many non-obvious tradeoffs; I am not sure whether on the whole, we are better off with or without them - time will tell


Even if the information consumers are 99% of the users, making the features available for the content creators leads to much better content. Plus people want the ability to be able to post content if they need to. I shall point to the /r/ask* subreddits as an example.


Hacker News doesn't allow you to build an audience, so every post has to appeal to the average HN reader to get attention.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: