Maybe SSH/3 instead (*SSH* + HTTP*/3*)?

throwaway127482 · 2025-09-27T17:48:07 1758995287

Doesn't /3 mean v3? I mean, for HTTP itself, doesn't the HTTP/3 == HTTPv3? If so, I don't see how this is any better than SSH3 - both SSH3 and SSH/3 read to me like "SSH v3"

theandrewbailey · 2025-09-27T18:23:28 1758997408

Yes, but HTTP is about the only thing that versions with a slash. By writing it SSH/3, it would emphasize its relationship with HTTP/3, instead of it being the third version of SSH.

Dylan16807 · 2025-09-28T00:08:01 1759018081

> Doesn't /3 mean v3?

I've seen very little do that. Probably just HTTP, and it's using a slash specifically to emphasize a big change.

techscruggs · 2025-09-27T16:55:20 1758992120

I like this idea!

Having SSH in the name helps developers quickly understand the problem domain it improves upon.