Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure, why not. It seems to be a pretty good exposition of the material. When I got interested in this stuff many years ago I worked my way through the 'typing rules' in the coq (nowadays rocq) manual. That is a 'slightly' higher friction way of learning this stuff. This document seems to be more pedagogical.


Have you found this stuff useful during the many years since you learned it? Or you don't mean you mastered it enough to judge its usefulness?


I have a personal coq/rocq project regarding the verification of software so for that purpose it is highly useful. I also wrote a proof assistent myself (https://github.com/chrisd1977/system).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: