Env vars are unordered name=value pairs, so are suited for such data.
In contrast, arguments are an ordered sequence of strings, so are more suited for present/not-present flags (e.g. --dry-run) , or listing a variable number of values (e.g. filenames). Using arguments for name=value data either requires individual strings to be parsed into components, or requires a pair of name and value strings to appear sequentially (without overlapping another pair, etc.). Arguments also tend to require disambiguation, e.g. prepending names with `--`, to account for optional arguments not being present, or for allowing options to be given in any order, etc. That may also require escape hatches, like a standalone `--` argument, in case user data conflicts with such reserved patterns, etc.
Sure, there are libraries for parsing this stuff; and conventions that we can get used to (except when a tool doesn't follow them...), but it's still a complicated mess compared to `NAME1=val1 NAME2=val2 my-command --flag1 --flag2 file1 file2 file3`
In contrast, arguments are an ordered sequence of strings, so are more suited for present/not-present flags (e.g. --dry-run) , or listing a variable number of values (e.g. filenames). Using arguments for name=value data either requires individual strings to be parsed into components, or requires a pair of name and value strings to appear sequentially (without overlapping another pair, etc.). Arguments also tend to require disambiguation, e.g. prepending names with `--`, to account for optional arguments not being present, or for allowing options to be given in any order, etc. That may also require escape hatches, like a standalone `--` argument, in case user data conflicts with such reserved patterns, etc.
Sure, there are libraries for parsing this stuff; and conventions that we can get used to (except when a tool doesn't follow them...), but it's still a complicated mess compared to `NAME1=val1 NAME2=val2 my-command --flag1 --flag2 file1 file2 file3`