Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It sounds like your trouble with async is mistaking concurrency for parallelism.


Weird claim since threads were originally introduced as a concurrency primitive, basically a way to make user facing programs more responsive while sharing the same address space and CPU.

The idea of generalizing threads for use in parallel computing/SMP didn't come until at least a decade after the introduction of threads for use as a concurrency tool.


> Weird claim since threads were originally introduced as a concurrency primitive

Wasn't this only true when CPUs were single core only? Only when multi core CPUs came, true parallelism could happen (outside of using multiple CPUs)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: