> "If the company is less certain – but still believes the advertiser is a likely scammer – Meta charges higher ad rates as a penalty, according to the documents"
In other words: More "uncatchable" scammers == higher scam rate == more $$$$ for Meta
I'd assume whoever came up with this scheme was rewarded handsomely by Facebook
In other words: More "uncatchable" scammers == higher scam rate == more $$$$ for Meta
I'd assume whoever came up with this scheme was rewarded handsomely by Facebook