Exactly. As said higher in this comment chain: > So, constant, but repeatedly re... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Zambyte 41 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: John Carmack on mutable variables Exactly. As said higher in this comment chain: > So, constant, but repeatedly redefined.

skeezyjefferson 40 days ago [–]

it was constant if it could have been redefined, by the basic definition of what constant means. so no, not constant, but constants

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact