I understand where you're coming from. On the other hand, there's a lesson to learn from the teacher's point of view as well. We always need to take a step back to understand the weakest links in security. A small piece of electrical tape or maybe even a strategically placed VHS cover could solve the issue. Hopefully, this hadn't happened again.
It also comes to: should a teacher "trust" their students not to be intentionally disruptive in interesting ways? Now I wonder if I should similarly trust my users (who are co-workers who are at least getting paid to not cause disruptions)...
I'd be willing to bet that's the only time the teacher had to deal with that specific skulduggery.
Is it actually worth it for a teacher to spend time red-teaming basic lesson equipment? I really think not unless the teacher has reason to believe her students are particularly mischievous.
A punishment may (or may not) be deterrent enough for the people who saw it. However, when you get a new class/userbase regularly or when new technology becomes available (including devices that can control your hardware remotely), an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Perhaps using your watch as intended doesn't seem particularly mischievous in the moment. In this way, legitimate users/sys admins/script kiddies get into trouble because a sys admin didn't have reason to believe their users would be "particularly mischievous".
Exactly. I did the same with my wrist remote in class. After the second time the TV turned off, without saying anything the teacher went to his desk, picked up a notecard, and propped it up over the remote sensor.
It also comes to: should a teacher "trust" their students not to be intentionally disruptive in interesting ways? Now I wonder if I should similarly trust my users (who are co-workers who are at least getting paid to not cause disruptions)...