Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A farmer is a valuable perspective but imagine asking a lumberjack about the ecological effects of deforestation, he might know more about it than an average Joe, but there's probably better people to ask for expertise?

> Honestly, we probably use more water than they do

This kind of proves my point, regardless of the actual truth in this regard, it's a terrible argument to make: availability of water starts to become a huge problem in a growing amount of places, and this statement implies the water usage of something, that in basic principle doesn't need water at all, uses comparable amount of water as farming, which strictly relies on water.



The author of the article followed the quote from the farmer with a fact-checked (this is the New Yorker) note about water usage for AI training.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: