Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree cookie banners were the wrong solution, and sometimes made things worse (it make a cookie whitelist extensions I used to use unusable because you have to allow the cookie that stores your cookie preferences).

However, this bit concerns me:

> This key change is part of a new Digital Package of proposals to simplify the EU’s digital rules, and will initially see cookie prompts change to be a simplified yes or no single-click prompt ahead of the “technological solutions” eventually coming to browsers. Websites will be required to respect cookie choices for at least six months, and the EU also wants website owners to not use cookie banners for “harmless uses” like counting website visits, to lessen the amount of pop-ups.

That implies there will be "harmless tracking" allowed, and it removes choices. The latter might restrict dark patterns, but it might also encourage "allow all cookies or you cannot read the site at all" approaches.



Fine I can vote with my feet and avoid sites that say "no cookies, no lookie" and use archive if I am really eager to read something.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: