Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Users can opt-out by not using the service or buying an ad-free version if available.

One would think that developers should not be forced to offer for free a version monetized with 60% less effective ads. And I understand currently this is indeed not the case for small developers, they can offer paid ad-free or free but with personalized ads. Large platforms apparently cannot.



If you want to do business in the EU, just follow the law.

You are not allowed to sell Heroin to anyone in Germany. I don't see you making the argument, that we should - in the same fashion as with digital spyware using companies - not target drug dealers. Becase hey, people can just decide to not buy drugs.

[Edit]: Typo


That’s not how the GDPR and cookie laws work at all


That’s how most news websites work in Europe: accept the cookies, or pay.


Yes, but opt-out tracking data which is not necessary for the operation of the primary use case of the app is not allowed.

It must be opt-in, truly a free choice, and informed consent, and declining must be as easy as accepting.


My search told me that unless you are a gatekeeper, offering a reasonably priced ad-free tier allows to make the ad-monetized version personalized only.

I think it makes sense. Either pay, or consent to effective ads. There's no free lunch


You are allowed to serve ads, but not use data to serve personalised ads without free choice opt-in.

In theory of course, in practice nothing is being governed or fined for smaller companies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: