Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If it were this inevitable, would AI be pushed down our throats, against our will, against our own laws, even, so hard?




Because the ones pushing it down your throats are trying to capture the entire market and get you to adopt their AI instead of a competitor.

The industrial revolution was pushed down the throats of a lot of people who were sufficiently upset by the developments that they invented communism, universal suffrage*, modern* policing, health and safety laws, trade unions, recognisably modern* state pensions, the motor car (because otherwise we'd be knee-deep in horse manure), zoning laws, passports, and industrial-scale sewage pumping.

I do wonder who the AI era's version of Marx will be, what their version of the Communist Manifesto will say. IIRC, previous times this has been said this on HN, someone pointed out Ted Kaczynski's manifesto.

* Policing and some pensions and democracy did exist in various fashions before the industrial revolution, but few today would recognise their earlier forms as good enough to deserve those names today.


  "You bet your ass we're all alike... We've been spoon fed baby food at school when we hungered for steak... The bits of meat that you did let slip through were pre-chewed and tasteless. We've been dominated by sadists, or ignored by the apathetic. The few that had something to teach found us willing pupils, but those few are like drops of water in the desert."

"Arguably we would have been better off knee-deep in horse manure." -- MarxGPT

> I do wonder who the AI era's version of Marx will be

Serena Butler.


I think some companies are making a mistake laying off employees who don't use it; because it's more important that employees have autonomy to choose the right tool for the job.

The mistake is pushing it too aggressively, instead of judging on the result of the job itself.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: