This looks like it was the output of running a Starlink app log through an LLM. The data is interesting but I don't think it supports the conclusions.
I'm also interested in whatever LLM was used not being able to use Google to determine that CADY is the Starlink internal clock module, and that on the latest board revisions it isn't present and I think the `false` state is expected and maybe a red herring.
I'm also interested in whatever LLM was used not being able to use Google to determine that CADY is the Starlink internal clock module, and that on the latest board revisions it isn't present and I think the `false` state is expected and maybe a red herring.