Bottom Line
All LLMs agree: Grokipedia is useful for quick orientation but unreliable for serious research, especially on political, controversial, or current event topics. Wikipedia remains the more trustworthy alternative.
Because of (1) all the people using them uncritically, (2) that they're elite projects in a field whose foudation of "what even are bugs here?" includes amongst its narratives stories of how elites can abuse them for personal gain
I then asked Claude Opus to sumup: https://markdownpastebin.com/?id=aa29d92662ac4a9ea7f9b3c1d9a...
Bottom Line All LLMs agree: Grokipedia is useful for quick orientation but unreliable for serious research, especially on political, controversial, or current event topics. Wikipedia remains the more trustworthy alternative.