Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They have a setting for that?

That's crazy, feels like prompting "make no mistakes" to the llm.

If it works, when would you want it turned on? Why isn't false the default



Because it would break all setuid binaries? Same reason the Linux kernel doesn't set no_new_privs (https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/no_new_privs.html) by default.

As an operator you are responsible for configuring your environment correctly. I would recommend starting here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/



It's equivalent to setting no_new_privs on the container process, so it'd mean you have to grant a privelege to the container process if you want any children to have access to it. It sure sounds funny in a CVE context, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: