Why do we want the layman to be using Linux? To give Valve more Linux customers or something?
Idiot users are toxic; anything that touches them rots.
Wow. The level of arrogance and elitism on display here is breathtaking.
This is why Linux on the desktop is irrelevant. Not the fact that it's incompatible with most mainstream software, not the fact that it's low profile or the fact that most Linux desktops look and function like Windows' retarded younger brother – but because a tiny minority of the otherwise hugely welcoming community set themselves up as some sort of entitled priesthood and actively discourage 'idiot users' from getting involved.
New users, even idiot ones, are good. Yes, they bring problems and stupid questions. Everyone has to start somewhere. But more people involved means more investment and helps challenge entrenched assumptions about how things should work. Making things shinier and more accessible does not equal dumbing things down.
Why shouldn't everyone be able to use an approachable, thoughtfully designed system that 'just works' and yet shares our values of freedom, community and open source?
>but because a tiny minority of the otherwise hugely
>welcoming community set themselves up as some sort of
>entitled priesthood and actively discourage 'idiot users'
>from getting involved.
I've spoken to many people over the years and looked at why they use Windows rather than Linux. The reasons, in order from most common are:
1. Lack of the applications they need; nearly always Outlook and Excel
2. Familiarity with Windows that they feel they've invested a lot of time in
3. Simply didn't realise there even was an alternative
Out of all the people I've talked to, there have been a grand total of ZERO that have ever given "Had a bad experience with a member of the Linux community" as a reason. None. Ever.
So, I'm more than a little dubious about your claim that this is in fact the main reason. Got any figures to back up that little theory of yours?
> Making things shinier and more accessible does not equal dumbing things down.
Except in practice, it almost always seems to. Which is why I don't and can't do any significant development, or work of nearly any kind for that matter, on Android, or an iPad.
> Which is why I don't and can't do any significant development, or work of nearly any kind for that matter, on Android, or an iPad.
That's about picking the right tool for the job, not dumbing down.
It's like complaining that a trowel is a dumbed down shovelling device because it can't make any significant headway with digging a massive trench.
That said, I develop Drupal sites locally on my jailbroken iPad and it's pretty nifty to have access to a full development environment on something that portable.
Arrogance or not, the fact remains that community developed Android distributions have all the unskilled users Ubuntu could ever dream of having, yet the projects are even worse.
Projects that rely on community support simply cannot handle the load. It is a failing of community driven open source to be sure, it would be great if it were otherwise, but I simply see absolutely no reason to think it is not reality. Your theory is nice, and it would be nice if it were reality, but it does not fit the data.
Idiot users are toxic; anything that touches them rots.
Wow. The level of arrogance and elitism on display here is breathtaking.
This is why Linux on the desktop is irrelevant. Not the fact that it's incompatible with most mainstream software, not the fact that it's low profile or the fact that most Linux desktops look and function like Windows' retarded younger brother – but because a tiny minority of the otherwise hugely welcoming community set themselves up as some sort of entitled priesthood and actively discourage 'idiot users' from getting involved.
New users, even idiot ones, are good. Yes, they bring problems and stupid questions. Everyone has to start somewhere. But more people involved means more investment and helps challenge entrenched assumptions about how things should work. Making things shinier and more accessible does not equal dumbing things down.
Why shouldn't everyone be able to use an approachable, thoughtfully designed system that 'just works' and yet shares our values of freedom, community and open source?