If that's the case, then why wasn't the RSA patent revoked due to prior art? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		spc476 on April 3, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Patent Protection Racket If that's the case, then why wasn't the RSA patent revoked due to prior art?

jacques_chester on April 3, 2013 [–]

Prior art has to be published.

For some strange reason, Her Majesty's cryptographers at GCHQ were loathe to give up all their classified goodies during the cold war. :)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact