Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So presumably you'd characterise --

"I am claiming that for whatever reasons he is here dressing up, in the trappings of scientific discourse, what is in fact an unsupported assertion meshing well with his favored opinion. McConnell is abusing the mechanism of scientific citation to lend authority to a claim which derives it only from a couple studies which can be at best described as “exploratory” (and at worst, maybe, as “discredited”)."

-- as Bossavit's "analysis and arguments" which you can evaluate for yourself.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: