Of course they're apologizing, it would be crazy to let a vendetta form over something like this. But that doesn't mean Leo wasn't justified here.

If he'd let Arrington, speak, Arrington would have mentioned that Palm seems to have only been giving review units to reviewers who have previously given the Palm Pre favorable coverage.

I'm honestly not surprised since Leo is a nice guy. However, it speaks to Arrington's character that he would accuse Leo of bias before allowing him to explain why he liked the pre. I agree with Leo's original assessment that Arrington is a Troll.

A pox on both their houses.

They're talking to each other directly now. Both said they were basically mortified about the incident. I have more respect for Arrington after this than before it.