I would even drop the "C++11" reference and just keep refering to it as C++. May... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		shin_lao on Nov 27, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Rook's Guide to C++ I would even drop the "C++11" reference and just keep refering to it as C++. Maybe just mention in the forewords that you need a C++11/14 compiler.

dkersten on Nov 27, 2013 [–]

I agree with this. I only mentioned "C++11" in my comment so that its clear what I'm referring to.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact