Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Similarly, a person who has been unemployed for a long time may have a hard time finding a new job - even if they are highly skilled and qualified. Potential employers attribute wrongly the person's lack of employment to the person rather than the situation. This causes the potential employers to search more intensively for flaws or other negative characteristics that are "congruent" with or explain the person's failure and to discount the applicant's virtues."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_proof



It's pretty obvious one would have thought. Success is a better confirmation than alleged ability.


That's not the most relevant Wikipedia link you could give. This is called the fundamental attribution error: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error


Social proof doesn't explain the result adequately; to wit:

Conversely, men rate women as less desirable when they are surrounded by other men, compared to being alone or surrounded by other women.


Social proof can't explain it but I've known very few individuals who have the guts to approach a party of mixed sexes (e.g. who are couples - when it's all women - you can assume they're just socializing, not dating (usually)). Actually, it doesn't matter whether it's all women or mixed - still intimidating.

The times I've done it / the first twenty seconds after you have broached their airspace is among the most scary and exhilirating experiences. The more women, the better. Do not hover!

For bonus points, sidle over and drag a chair loudly from one side of a room to where they are and sit down (presuming they are seated, you have most likely pulled off the icebreaker that needs no icebreaker)




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: