Newsdiffs.org is useful to track both minor and major changes made to stories.
More generally, it's a convenient if limited way into the publishing process. It deserves scrutiny, all the more so for those PR-type articles that essentially try to covey nonsense.
More generally, it's a convenient if limited way into the publishing process. It deserves scrutiny, all the more so for those PR-type articles that essentially try to covey nonsense.
http://www.newsdiffs.org/article-history/www.nytimes.com/201...