Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hi, I'd like to hear more why data couldn't bridge that gap and why Google maps would work accross the world for cars but not for public transits.

- The game would be probably to provide some kind of standard or API that would make all those independant providers rally accross a common model. Would save communities cost & improve the service. Probably a big market.

- If you look outside of the US, public transit (in some form or the other) is for wealthy people as well. Think Japan & Europe.



> The game would be probably to provide some kind of standard or API that would make all those independant providers rally accross a common model.

This common specification already exists. It is called GTFS [1] (General Transit Feed Specification) and can be used to exchange static transit data. There is also GTFS-realtime [2], an extension to GTFS, to be used to exchange realtime transit data.

The specification was designed through a partnership of the initial Live Transit Updates partner agencies, a number of transit developers and Google. The specification was introduced and released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license in August 2011.

[1] https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/ [2] https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs-realtime/


In addition to GTFS, in Europe we have Transmodle [0], with the UK implementation being TransXChange [1], for scheduled public transit timetables and SIRI for real-time [2].

The TransXChange schema guide is a 300+ page PDF [3], so there is a big barrier to entry.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmodel [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransXChange [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Interface_for_Real_Time... [3] http://81.17.70.199/transxchange/schema/2.5/doc/TransXChange...


I'd like to add as an example the city in Europe I live in. The reason my city doesn't have public transit coverage in Google Maps is that they seem to have an exclusive deal with a local public-transit-route-finding company. I get it that business is business, free markets, etc. but this is clearly a suboptimal solution for an end-user. The website they give their data to is not bad, but Google Maps are clearly, objectively, better for both locals and tourists.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: