Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | samuli's commentslogin

I have been wondering also about this. Why would you use a leaf blower when you can use an electric leaf mulcher, which shreds the leaves, seed and sticks. You can then dispose the leaves in your garden or put it into bio waste.


..and if you don't like sharpening knives, you can buy a serrated vegetable knife for cutting fruit like tomatoes.


SSAB is completing their new 190-tonne alternate current electric arc furnace by end of next year, which should yield about 500-800k carbon free tonnes of steel plate and coil per year.

They plan to convert all their Nordic plants to carbon free by 2030 and have some plants also in the North America.

https://eurometal.net/ssab-starts-construction-of-eaf-at-oxe... https://www.ssab.com/en/news/2025/03/new-electric-arc-furnac...


Different thing. Electric arc furnaces are old technology.

What is new here is direct reduction of iron ore to iron metal, electrolytically. It makes the input feedstock for your EAFs.

Smelting has always been the most carbon-intensive part of steelmaking.


There's also what's called an electric smelt furnace, that has a couple of variations, currently being trialed by two global scale producers at bigger than MIT lab scale, but less than production:

ESF- https://www.energyinnovation.net.au/article/the-electric-sme...

Fortescue- https://metals.fortescue.com/en/our-projects/green-metal-pro...

BlueScope, BHP and Rio Tinto- https://www.riotinto.com/en/news/releases/2024/bluescope-bhp...


European mindset is more about everybody being equal, than becoming better than others.


This is a bit idealistic. I don't think its any more true than saying the American mindset is about freedom and the European mindset is about control, in that neither are true.


Sounds like the road to Communism


It's a slippery slope. One day you're providing free health care to children, the next you're being rolled into a mass grave in a gulag.



We used to be in Regus' offices, which had the option to use their spaces in other countries too. Not having used WeWork I do not know how it compares, but at least you can use Regus' office in Paris or Mexico City if you want.


Don't know the OP's region, but my region, Europe passed a consumer protection law, that says basically that we must be able to opt out of tracking and automated profiling, if we choose so, without disruption to the service.

Laws have consequences, but without consumer protection laws, the consumers are be walked over by the corporations every time, everywhere.


I guess the next step in humanity's finale is then for someone to create a worm, which installs this plugin automatically to all machines that haven't been patched up to the latest level.


I'm not sure how serious you are with this comment, but feel free to look at the source code. It only has access to files you've explicitly added to the project directory.


You’ve put that restriction in as a safety valve. I’m sure it would be easy to remove. Op’s concern remains.


How would it be removed?


I tend to take four weeks in the summer, one week in fall, and one in winter. So six weeks a year in total. I live in Europe.


86% of feed is grown on land [1], which is not suitable for growing human food crops.

[1]: https://www.agfoundation.org/common-questions/view/could-mor...


You're quoting a literal farming foundation, so here is a neutral source:

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use#half-of-the-world-s-habi...

"If we combine pastures used for grazing with land used to grow crops for animal feed, livestock accounts for 77% of global farming land. Of all the land we use for agriculture, 77% of it is used for livestock."

These 77% are only responsible for 18% of the produced calories and 37% of the produced proteins.

So, if you leave out water consumption and most importantly animal walfare, eating meat is the worst thing you can to for the environment (when talking about food).


Nothing said here refutes the parent comment. It turns out that a lot of land is really shitty for growing stuff that isn't a weed (without adding a ton of chemicals to the environment), and humans don't eat weeds. Cows, sheep, pigs, and chicken do.

I doubt that 86% of that 77% is truly unsuitable for farming human food, but I wouldn't be surprised if 30-50% of it was.


It is naive to believe that these 86%, assuming the numbers are true, have any impact on the food production at all.

Of all the cropland we have, 57% is used to produce human food and 43% is used to produce animal food.

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets#more-plant-based-d...

The whole point is that you need way more crops in general to "produce" the same amount of calories & proteins. That's because feeding the animals with crops instead of eating them is highly inefficient in comparison to eating them directly. "As an example: beef has an energy efficiency of about 2%. This means that for every 100 kilocalories you feed a cow, you only get 2 kilocalories of beef back."

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets#livestock-waste-a-...

With how much meat is eaten right now, there is just no way we have enough grazing land to produce enough meat. 99% of meat comes from factory farms. [1] These animals are always fed with crops, so there will always be land usage to product food for animals. And it is way more inefficient.

[1]: https://www.livekindly.com/99-animal-products-factory-farms/


The implicit assumption that you are making is that all cropland is fungible and that the 43% used for animal food can be converted directly to human food. That is almost certainly not the case. Also, the original comment's 86% doesn't imply that it is necessarily "cropland" - just that it is land that grows animal feed.

You see this with human crops too - Why do people grow corn when almonds are much higher dollar value per acre? Why not wine grapes? The reason is because not every patch of land is suitable for high-value cash crops. Going down the quality scale, not every patch of land is suitable for food for human consumption either. The reason why is that "cropland" is not fungible - soil has particular characteristics, nutrients, contaminants, and microorganisms, all of which affect which crops you can grow.


This is plain false. Please find reputable sources.


> This is plain false. Please find reputable sources.

Do you have reputable sources for that statement being "plain false"?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: