Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
My Notebook System (ratfactor.com)
182 points by ingve on Feb 20, 2022 | hide | past | favorite | 67 comments


I think there are actually two different purposes to notebooks: technical, and "emotional".

I now keep notebooks for technical purposes. A note will typically take a page or two. I have a contents page, too, where I list the headings of each page. Contents pages are useful where you have structured information, like in a book. I haven't found them particularly useful in a notebook format, as topics jump around, so you have little idea as to where to look in a table of contents. I do keep an index, though. I'm finding this increasingly important. One twist I've begun adding is to write discursive posts on Wordpress. The notebook contains crucial summarising information, and dates to a blog post where some of the nuances are fleshed out.

There's also value in the more "emotional" aspect of notetaking: basically a diary. I remember that I used to keep a dream diary. Looking back, I realised just how violent my dreams were! They are also fun to look back on, and you can gain insights into your own personality through the broader sweep of time, rather than up close and personal. It can actually be quite interesting.

Less useful, though, is logging the time you brush your teeth.

On the more flippant side ... when I was at university I used to mark on the calendar whenever I took a dump. Being a student, I of course lived in none-too-salubrious circumstances. So I used to like to see if I could stretch things out a little, as it were. Brings a whole new meaning to keeping a log book. Oh, the foibles of human nature.

You should probably forget that I said that.


I used to keep a log of an even less socially-acceptable bodily function.

It was surprisingly informative! On average once a day, sometimes skip a day, sometimes twice on weekends. Almost never more than three times in the same day, unless I was purposely trying for a PB.


Thats pretty common. I also have a spreadsheet of that exact since 2015. I started when I learned about don't break the streak method. Its month/year on column 1, & days 1 to 31 on first row.


For many people, making notes is useful in and of itself. It forces you to bring ideas to the surface, and making a note of a thought helps to link it to other thoughts and other memories. As such, even if the notes are never referenced, the act of taking the note is of value.

But having made these notes, and gained the benefit of actually taking the note, do you ever reference them again? Using digital note-taking systems means that notes can be cross-referenced, searched, and used again in the future. These are additional potential benefits beyond the initial act of bringing it to the surface.

Do you ever refer to the notes again?

I ask this because I take notes, although not as comprehensively, and I'm intending to ramp up my efforts. But I'm converging to a system where I don't just take the notes, but have them migrate into a system where I can find them again, where I can pull them out and synthesise articles, papers, and other forms of output, so I'm interested to know about your context, and how you use your notebooks, beyond the initial creation.


I tend to take two kinds of notes:

1. Running todo list or quick combo-list of todo's for a specific project.

This is basically throw-away but has some historical interest in that it can be fun to flip back to todo list pages and see what a previous week looked like, in general. There is also interesting signal in the notes itself ... for instance, the more stressed I am, the large and more illegible my handwriting grows.

2. Notes taken on paper from a meeting or class or lesson.

These are often taken on paper for a specific reason (for one thing, when I talk to clients in person, I hate to have a laptop in front of me, even though I could type much quicker than I can write.) These notes I will generally photograph with my smartphone and upload directly to an online note taking system (Evernote has gotten a lot better again recently). I find that Evernote and presumably several other note taking systems are actually pretty good at basic OCR / I can generally search text that is written legibly on these notes. If I add some basic tags or other information to the note after it is uploaded, this pretty much fulfills my needs to be able to interact with the note digitally after the fact.


I just finished up a talk using a ZK like system, and I ended up revisiting my notes a few times. From my perspective, note taking has been useful for very specific applications like writing a blog post or preso, but I have piles of random notes just gathering digital dust.

I know the orthodoxy of ZK states you shouldn’t write something until you have sufficient notes to do so, and some will even go so far as to say you shouldn’t research a specific topic, but having a purpose for my note taking actually makes me stick to it.


Howdy! Good question. It's one I seem to not be able to answer satisfyingly even in, uh,

    $ wc -w wiki/ratf/src/notes.adoc
7621 words. (Geez.)

The "wrap-ups" (the distillation process from daily -> weekly -> monthly -> yearly) is of potentially enormous value and are a direct result of the daily logging. I stand by that.

It's hard to put a value on the notes as a capture system because it's difficult to know what I might have lost without it. I do know that if I don't write down great ideas, they're often lost forever, "Dangit, I had a clever little solution to Fermat's Last Theorem in the shower yesterday, but now I've forgotten it!" I am convinced that capturing them has increased my total idea retention.

Plenty of technical ideas I've jotted down also make it into my wiki and/or website, and those things are potentially referenced many, many times. I have absolutely searched for and found things in the digital daily logs. But as I say in the article, searching is really hard because I remember the "wrong" keywords later.

As you say: "the act of taking the note is of value" and I guess an additional benefit I'm just now thinking of are all of the ideas I have NOT acted upon. By writing them down, I feel more confident I won't forget them. Which means I'm more comfortable about not acting on them "Right now before I forget!" Which means when I see the note again (even just when transcribing the next morning), I've had time to cool off and make a better decision about pursing that thing. (ALL ideas are written down, and 99% of them get transcribed even if I have no intention of pursuing them.) I'll add this to the article.

Finally, once I stopped logging brushing my teeth and that sort of thing, the effort-to-value went way up. :-)


Yes but not really in the way you're thinking.

I take notes as I work, and if I write something down that I refer to often or modify and build on, it'll probably get migrated-and-refined to a later page so I can continue to reference it there.

If it continues to be useful beyond that and outside of its original context, it gets moved into my digital, searchable notes. Which is more like a personal snippet library/documentation thing than notes.

But anyway yes I reference them, but absolutely not in the way you would reference something that came up in a text search, and I don't go looking for them in a comparable way or expect them to behave like that. It's a different system with different uses I have a car but I still ride my bike most places you know?


I have a system that randomly show "cards" of notes that are less than 150 words. I don't reference them often, but I often end up doing deeper analysis of information behind the notes all the time.

Or just linking them into big trees of cards like a wiki.

There are time when I search for information only to realize that they are already in my notes already.


I think there’s tremendous value in just offloading your thoughts from your brain to a notebook!

I rarely refer to previous notes (digital or paper) even as a researcher.


Excellent read.

Looking at these notebooks, I'm amazed and appreciate the self-discipline that the author has exercised.

But a question one should always ask: what could I have done with all that time if I hadn't put it in taking notes? (Write a whole novel?) That's the dreaded question of _opportunity cost_. You can spend your time only once!

EDIT: I also strongly agree with the utility of paper note-taking as frictionless system and with the author's choice of pen & ISO based date/time formats.


For me, the phone and laptop are full of online productivity killers like HN and Reddit. Staying off them is a struggle. With a pen in hand and work notebook open, there is no urge to do anything but work with it.

Other than that I just note all to-do's with checkboxes and write short notes, sometimes I work out a project idea into a larger plan. I number the to-do's to see if that becomes useful some day, and to force me to consider how old some of them are.

On Mondays I review the last week and the first Monday of the month I do a thorough review of the last, deciding if each unchecked item is still relevant and moving the ones that are over to this month.

But the first point is the most important.


> Only paper has been fast enough and flexible enough to work in every condition.

I don't give much on the whole self optimization spiel. But I took the parts from Bullet Journal that worked for me. And added my own parts through trial and error.

Nowadays I do task management with pen and paper as I can only agree with the quote above. I have yet to find something faster or with less friction.


I riffed on bullet journaling to create a habits tracker. My template is just a big grid; tasks along the left side, calendar along the top. This allows me to see at a glance how I'm doing. (Riffing on Seinfeld's "don't break the chain".)

Some of the tasks reference other sections of my bullet journaling, like to do items, time logs, journaling, and daily praise.

I tried using a bunch of different apps on my phone. Square peg, round hole. And toting around a physical journal is a helpful nudge to stick with the program.

YMMV.


A markdown file on my phone synchronized with syncthing to my desktop and laptop has been pretty seamless and doesn't require me to carry anything additional to my normal items.


How do you synchronize it? And how do you feel about the ergonomics of markdown editing on the phone?

I personally use markdown pretty exclusively for my notes, but I do find myself needing to open up my laptop for that. If I'm not around one, I'll jot something down either on paper or on my phone, but I still need to manually copy it over to my git-backed markdown on laptop. I'd love to avoid that manual step if possible.


Syncthing (https://syncthing.net/) is how I synchronize, which works fine since I'm the only editor. Currently I use Markor (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.gsantner.m...) which is pretty minimalist markdown editing.


I use syncthing to sync many (probably too many) files. I use a shared directory structure between my desktop and laptop and then use my phone as a middleman since I never have my desktop and laptop on at the same time so I need a third device to sync with. It works REALLY well and I rarely have to ever think about it.


I use GitJournal, and it's been super nice - I just wrote a post on that system: https://www.bbkane.com/blog/how-i-take-notes/

It's kinda rambling, but scroll down to the middle for the list of apps I've settled kni


I tried git journal. And while it worked for fleshing out ideas for blog postings. Or stuff I at least spend 60 seconds typing. I agree.

But noting done some small idea/to do while I am talking to a client is still quicker on paper in my notebook that always lies open next to me.


Obsidian’s mobile app has a quick command toolbar above the keyboard for the typical markdown markups, like bold, list, checkboxes, etc. You also can pull down on the screen and access the command pallet for other options.


The paper/portability/digitisation conundrum is one I can never break. I agree UX of paper is miles ahead of any app. But it’s not indexable or searchable.

So what?

- scan paper notes... still don’t have it searchable. Plus notebooks are not that easy to scan

- pay someone to transcribe it: probably not cheap, plus privacy issues

- something like remarkable: quite a lot more expensive than pen and paper

Anyone have any suggestions on this front?


I started to write a reply to this, but realised it was turning into a full blog post in its own right, so I've copied it out for later, and will give a skeleton reply here.

Some notes you can take while you're sitting at a machine. You can probably type as fast as you can write, possibly faster, so typed notes can go straight into whatever system[0] you use.

Other notes occur when you're walking, or eating, or meditating, or exercising. For those I have two processes. One is simply use the "Notepad" app on my Android phone, hit the microphone, and dictate directly. The other is to write it on paper and mark it as "unfiled". These are unrefined notes. Later I revisit them and convert them into the first type of note, and, as above, insert them into my system, then mark them as "filed" (or just delete them).

But how do you insert them into your system? For some people it's just a case of recording them in a searchable repository, and there they leave them until such a time as they perform the right search.

However ...

In my opinion, the value of a note-taking, note-preserving system is not in simply having lots of notes. For me, the value is in the "conversation" that I have with my repository. That conversation happens whenever I choose to interrogate the system, but it also happens as a part of the process of inserting notes.

Inserting notes is an active process. I don't just "write and forget-until-searched". Inserting a note means finding a place to insert it, devising and using hashtags, connecting this note to other notes, creating backlinks, adding annotations to other notes, and generally enriching the whole system.

It's working for me.

[0] This is entirely another kettle of fish.


What about digital paper[1]?

Basically paper with a patten on it that can be read by a camera in the pen. The pen can then transmit that to your main computer.

It’s not new tech but it is pretty cheap and solves the scanning issue.

Moleskine[2] amongst others sell something like that but ther non-premium paper is available too.

I think UK social services used to use them at one time. Much cheaper and less likely to be stolen than a tablet.

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_paper

2. https://www.moleskine.com/en-gb/shop/moleskine-smart/smart-w...


I don't care much about digitizing my notes these days. Instead, I do a weekly review on my notes, and type anything that might benefit from being searched into my computer.

The primary reason is that for any notes that I want to put into my digital database, I have to do a lot of editing anyway. My first draft notes are full of short-hands, dangling sentences, struck out words, back-and-forth thoughts; while I need them to be self-contained, clear, more bullet-point-ish, and better organized inside the computer. So I might as well just type a second draft.


> scan paper notes... still don’t have it searchable. Plus notebooks are not that easy to scan

There are notebooks specifically made to be easily scanable, eg. https://www.leuchtturm1917.com/whitelines-link.html

Another options are binders, so that you can just take out the pages, put them into a feeder and scan all of them. ... or you can rip a notebooks spine and do the same thing, but have a ripped notebook.

That said, I tried various tablets, galaxy note devices, scanning ... and mostly use paper still. No worries about battery life, free form, nicer pens and the biggest benefit: a big desk allows you to just have multiple pages next to each other, open previous notes on the side and draw freely on all of them. A tablet/ereader can replace one page, but not multiple at the same time. Sure, search, version control, copy&paste and easy backups would be nice, but not enough of an advantage over paper.


A moderate expense of a few hundred dollars really shouldn't be an impediment for a good notetaking system that improves your life. Skimping on this is a false economy, like skimping on a good chair or mattress.


Probably Zettlekasten. If you have easy tear sheets in a notebook, you could make a system out of it. It's very particular, but might work for you: https://zettelkasten.de/introduction/


Just in case you haven't seem them yet, the Rocketbook "Smart Notebook" tries to pave a path between taking natural notes with pen and ink and capturing them digitally for various purposes, including searching the OCR'd handwriting.


The time it takes to unlock and open the app is a major issue. It's still much faster than I can write a complete sentence by hand, but slow enough to discourage me from writing more.

I've always thought that a new class of ultra rugged, old Nokia but with apps type device is needed. Maybe some kind of special purpose smaller than a phone digital notebook could solve this.

It wouldn't need much computing power at all, since it could do everything via Bluetooth link to a real phone. With a memory LCD the battery would last weeks.

For me, I'm so out of practice with pen and paper that I could probably learn a new input method as just easily as I could learn to write without stopping to think about every letter, so maybe even a keychain sized device would be possible.


Thats interesting to me since i cant for the life of me write anything down while being so organized. Most of my notes are sporadic writings whenever i cant sleep because my brain is stuck chugging out ideas.

If i had digital notebook that i could write by hand, and it all went to my nextcloud, i think i would use that more than typing things down with onscreen keyboard.


I liked reading this. For me emacs with orgmode works better. Went from evernote to onenote, to tiddlywiki, mediawiki...to emacs. My handwriting is so unreadable even I cant read it sometimes :-) Plus, I would fear losing the paper notebook..although how often have I irretrievably lost something? Never. Anyway, thanks for sharing.


One issue I found with computer based setup when working is that... there are 2 of them.

When I was in college I had folders of notes and it's read and updated regularly. Once I got issued a work laptop; the personal one sometimes don't get turned on in days... and rapidly became outdated.


> there are 2 of them

Do you have a phone (doesn't have to be one you're using)? At least on android, you can install syncthing and use it as a middleman. I use emacs org mode for many of my notes and this system works well. My computers are NEVER online at the same time but the phone is always on so it will always be up-to-date with the latest files. It also serves as another backup location. Works wonders.


I use syncthing to keep notes from Boostnote (as well as other things) in sync across multiple computers. I imagine the same would work well with emacs org mode.


I enjoyed this. My “newish” system is very similar, but I go long periods without writing in my notebook, even though I keep it in my pocket everyday.

My pen of choice is the space pen, also with a clip that lasts very well. The ink isn’t the best, but the clip and click action make it very good for a pocket notebook.


Dad? Are you on HN?

ETA: I love my dad. He does this.


I actually chuckled


My feeling on analog pen and paper is that it is easy to lose and hard to organize; so I prefer digital pen and paper.

For digital handwriting, I use MS OneNote with my Boox tablet but almost any modern tablet will do. MS OneNote also has the best handwriting to text feature I've found; which is useful to make reading past notes easier.

Another thing I've been using is Google sheets. Google Sheets makes it convenient to write short bullet point type notes under certain categories such as it is structured like this:

First column (area) - Second Column (sub-area) - Third Column (details)

Example:

Shopping - Groceries - Items to Order


Does a pen exist in the form factor of a Fisher’s Bullet Space Pen that has gel ink? I want something small to put in my front pocket that I can trust not to ever leak and also have gel pen.


Very interesting. I favour a completely opposite approach and I don't track anything of what I do, I just take notes looking at the future: what I should be doing next.

It's a sort of backlog and it's entirely digital and it gets reorganised constantly. Some of it is a freeform list of ideas I liked at some point or another. Some of it is what I absolutely need to do during the day. Some of it is what I absolutely need to do in the following week.


Great post. Thanks! I like the rhodia notebook series. The 'dotbook' is perfect for. Big enough to make sketches in with a spiral bind so pages lay flat but not to big to take with you on the go. I have one for daily to do lists and another for project stuff and technical notes. Paper is the best. Where necessary I print out stuff A5 size and stick it in...


I've myself at one point wanted to understand where time is spent, and, more importantly lost. Meaning, spent on unplanned distractions.

I've tried various software mechanisms, but it always ended up being too tedious.

Would love to see the hardware device in a small portable format!


I can't stand lined paper. My standard are MUJI blank paper notebooks. They strike the best balance between affordability and quality.

I don't use notebooks as much nowadays, though. I tend to have a computer closeby or I've found the iPad + Apple Pencil or a whiteboard surprisingly good for most things.


I used to use the same notebooks just to log things that I had accomplished throughout the day. It was neat to look back at, but ultimately I missed a few days that turned into missing even longer periods of time. It's neat to read about it in the extreme. I definitely understand the interest.


I've abandoned Field Notes and instead use a spiral-bound notebook with perforated pages. This makes it easier to toss pages after I transcribe them.

It's very satisfying to tear out a page after I'm done with it.


Question: in what pants pocket do you carry these?

I carry these in my pocket but I’m lucky if they last 30 days before the covers and spine disintegrate.


When I can, the pockets of FORBIDDEN CARGO PANTS (fashion screams intensify).


+1 for practicality


I was very interested in the "But" link but it lead to page not found.


Oops, ha ha, thank you! That's the downside of having a wiki plugin that creates links when you hit enter in normal mode. :-D


This article was a great read!


Great article!


Okay, but now tell us what is the most important thing you wrote in these 100 notebooks.


It's hard to tell if this is a genuine question ... it comes across as dismissive, and pretty much pure snark, and I suspect that's why you're being downvoted.

If you really do have a genuine question then we'd all benefit from seeing it asked and answered. If you're simply saying that in your opinion this is all a waste of time, then either have the courage to recognise that that's what you're saying and say it out loud, or don't say it.

I'm disappointed that you're not being constructive. I'm sure you don't really care about my opinion, but since you felt free to express yours, even if only in this coded form, then so I'm feeling free to express mine.


Is a genuine question. I wanted to know what he collected that was important in 100 notebooks. He links the Wikipedia article on 'quantified self' where it says that “[…]with the goal of improving physical, mental, and emotional performance. "

I just wanted to know if there was one thing that was worth doing all this for, because my opinion is that logging your data -quantitative data- doesn't make you better. That's all.


Then I'd ask that you read my comment and take it on board as personal feedback. Asking a rich question can be valuable for all of us, but what you said comes across as largely dismissive snark. Since you say you didn't intend it that way then I hope this feedback is useful for you.

As an example, I've tried to take my own advice and asked the rich question here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30409278


I have argued my question and told you my opinion on self logging and quantified self. I don't understand what else I should be asking. I personally am a strong advocate of note-taking and agree with your post above. I myself have collected notebooks, and now they rest on a shelf gathering dust since I don't do anything with them except flip through them for nostalgia and look at my drawings/sketches. I use Obsidian to collect the information I'm interested in and try to connect them together and I can research and connect the dots to form new ideas and I find the value in just connecting the ideas. Collecting and not using notes can be as therapeutic as those notebooks with mandalas to color.


Based on what you say here:

> I have argued my question and told you my opinion on self logging and quantified self. I don't understand what else I should be asking.

I feel like I've explained clearly why your initial reply has been down-voted, why people have asked you for clarification, and how that could all have been avoided. So I guess I have nothing further to add on that issue.

I find your comments about your note-taking interesting ... I wish you had given them in your initial reply, because then it would have been a top-level, information-rich comment. But I assume you had your reasons for replying as you did.

Thank you for the clarifications ... I think this discussion is complete.


Thanks, and BTW I never asked about why I was downvoted. People downvote just because they don't like my question because it sounds controversial? It's fine. This obsession with quantifying everything - life,likes, views, karma, upvotes, downvotes, page view, fitness data,health data - is typical of the mentality of the Lords of Silicon Valley. Thank you Morozov for enlightening me.


I'm not the author of the linked webpage, but here are some of the things I find valuable about my Markdown daily log:

- I don't have to rely on my possibly faulty memory about the details of past events. My logs often have considerably more detail than I remember over a year later, and I have already identified one instance where what I remembered was inconsistent with an email (not one of my logs, to be clear) I wrote at the time. I trust the email more than my memory.

- I can answer when something happened with full-text search.

- I can read through the logs chronologically to see the evolution of my thinking on many topics.

When I tell others about my daily log a lot of people seem interested in possible mental health benefits. I can say that I don't see any mental health benefits in my case. I don't write a gratitude journal or anything like that, as such things always seemed forced to me. I focus mostly on summarizing what happened in the day and what I'm thinking about that day.


What point are you trying to make?


I'm wondering if OP is able to make good use of all this 'self-logging' and find something interesting in these 100 notebooks. Is there anything worth having written ~1 page a day for, or not?


Maybe it's not the act of saving for later, but expressing it onto a concrete format to get it out of your head.


Not OP or the author but is "therapy" a worthy enough goal? I sometimes look back at some of my notes and feel a (nice) sense of time having passed by. Reminds me of how much little time we all have :)


That a lot of the time, notes aren’t used


I think it's a lot of landill but whatever floats your boat.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: